In classic hiking it fails.
In fastpacking, it is straightforwardly misleading.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n- slow rises<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- agile plains<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- controlled downward slopes<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- poorly managed stops<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Fastpacking is best planned when you think about:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n- hours of actual movement<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n
- not in total kilometres<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
This change of focus transforms everything.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\nIndicative rhythms in fastpacking (not to lie to you)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Without obsessing over exact figures, these benchmarks work for many people:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n- Upload<\/strong>: 400-600 m+\/h sustainable<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Llano<\/strong>: 5-6 km\/h walking fast<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Download<\/strong>very variable (do not count it as a \u201cgift\u201d)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
But beware:
these numbers only make sense if you don't stop every so often<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\nIn fastpacking, stopping badly breaks any calculation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\nThe slope: the great forgotten one<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Two 30 km routes have nothing to do with each other if one has:<\/p>\n\n\n\n